On Fri, 10 Aug 2012, Lior Kaplan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Ariel <asdeb...@dsgml.com> wrote:
But why drop them? They work perfectly. Is there any harm in leaving them
there?
As I said, lack of use. No harm in keeping them, just work due to PHP
related chanes (at that time it was work on PHP 5.4).
Please put it back? I need it! I've been searching for a package like this
for over a year! And I was just about to program it myself when I stumbled
across this.
And I don't understand how you can use popcon to track it considering
libhdate-php didn't even exist in squeeze. In fact, as far as I can tell
libhdate-php has never existed in debian at all.
That's becuase the package never made it to stable, but it was there
between October 2010 and April 2012 (see the changelog of the source
package). Let just say it had less users than the libhdate-python users in
this graph: http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=libhdate
libhdate-python made it to stable so that's not a fair comparison. This
is a server package, and servers virtually never run testing.
Please put it back. It works perfectly, so there is no extra maintenance
for you.
-Ariel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
