Antonio, Thanks for the prompt response, much appreciated.
On Sun, 2012-08-05 at 20:36 +0200, Antonio Valentino wrote: […] > Unfortunately numexpr doesn't work with Python 3. Curses. In which case I guess this bug report should be summarily closed. > Probably you should post on the NumExpr mailing list [1] a request for > Python 3 support. I guess I should download the source, try to install it for Python 3, have it fail, and enter a bug report. Presumably the Googlecode site http://code.google.com/p/numexpr/ is the mainline. > FYI I started a fork [2] to implement Python 3 support for numexpr but > it is still incomplete. > > If you are interested in having numexpr with Python 3 then maybe you > would like to contribute some code :) My interest in ensuring I can point people sensibly at NumPy during my Python courses rather than actually using it in anger. If though a not-large amount of time from me could help move things forward in a way that the NumExpr folks would accept then I can certainly justify this as loss leader. As a pre-step I'll clone the mainline and your clone and take a peek. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
