Hi Bart, Thanks a lot for your prompt reply.
Bart Martens wrote: > minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg/debian/copyright : > > | Source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/minidlna/files/ > | The icons.c file in the original tarball contained binary blobs of > possibly > | unfree images. It has hence been replaced in the DFSG tarball by a file > | containing the free Debian logo instead. It can be generated from the > SVG logo > | using the debian/make_icons.sh script (see the header of that file for > | instructions). > > http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-origtargz > > | A repackaged .orig.tar.{gz,bz2,xz} should not contain any file that does > not > | come from the upstream author(s), or whose contents has been changed by > you. > > So removing files is OK, adding/replacing files not. You're right, except that in this case, the source would fail to build if I simply removed icons.c, so I think it falls under the exception laid out in the footnote [1]: | As a special exception, if the omission of non-free files would lead | to the source failing to build without assistance from the Debian | diff, it might be appropriate to instead edit the files, omitting only | the non-free parts of them, and/or explain the situation in a | README.source file in the root of the source tree. But in that case | please also urge the upstream author to make the non-free components | easier separable from the rest of the source. [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#ftn.idp20146152 I haven't contacted upstream about it though, but I will do so shortly. But I now realize, reading the page you pointed to, that the top-level directory in my orig.tar is improperly named; right now, it's called minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg, and it should be minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg.orig (or is it minidlna-1.0.25.orig?). I wonder however, if the goal is to "make it possible to distinguish pristine tarballs from repackaged ones", if minidlna-1.0.25+dfsg doesn't make that clear enough already. It's the default name chosen by git-buildpackage, so if there is agreement that this isn't a good name, I'll submit a patch to change that. Thanks again for taking a look at my package; if there are any other issues (or if you think I didn't address your concerns appropriately), don't hesitate to let me know. Cheers, -- Benoît Knecht -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org