Chris Knadle writes ("Bug#682010: [mumble] Communication failures due to CELT codec library removal"): > Package: tech-ctte > Severity: normal ... > This refers to Bug #675971 (which is severity grave, and currently closed) > against the Mumble VoIP package, which is also affected by Bug #674650 > concerning the removal of the CELT library. This evening we also just > discovered the existence of Bug #674634 which concerns the CELT library > removal as well, and which may have more of the technical story.
Thanks for this, including the clear summary. > - From the point of view of the bug reporters, what we want is a > package that inter-operates with other Mumble clients and servers, > if possible. To do this today would require reintroducing the celt > source package again, which is rumored to have potential security issues. > [We have not seen any details on this yet.] > > Note: this evening we think we have found a security expert who is > willing to audit the CELT 0.7.1 codec for issues and possibly provide > patches, assuming this is reasonably feasible. This sounds like a good option to me. I will write to the security team and ask them for their opinion about CELT. >From what you say I think: - We should try to address the security problems, if any, in the celt 0.7.1 codec. An audit would be very good. - This is a serious problem for mumble at least and is arguably RC. Do you have people who are willing to be the maintainer(s) and (if necessary) sponsor(s) for the celt package ? I assume it would be possible to reintroduce a celt package which was very similar to the one recently removed, so as to avoid risking unnecessary bugs. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org