Hi Sergio First of all thanks for the quick reply!
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:56:03AM +0200, Sergio Talens-Oliag wrote: > El Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 08:53:37PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso va escriure: > > Hi Saulo > > > > (dropping the merged bugreport) > > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:42:00PM -0300, Saulo Soares de Toledo wrote: > > > News about the bug. > > > I received a response from SATOH Fumiyasu, smbldap-tools developer, about > > > the problem. It's fixed to smbldap-userlist and smbldap-grouplist at SVN > > > (revision 135): > > > > > > http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/smbldap-tools?view=revision&revision=135 > > > > > > It's needed check if there are other scripts with failures yet to close > > > the > > > bug. > > > > > > Thanks all! > > > > Cool, thanks for keeping up on that! Indeed the commited solution is > > much cleaner, safer and better als the eval workaround. > > > > Sergio, Release-Team should be asked, but it seems a little enough > > change that could have a possiblity to get a freeze-exception for this > > fix. > > OK, I'll update the package, but maybe we should wait till the end of the week > and ask for a new release of smbldap-tools, as the one in Debian is already > outdated. Please keep in mind that we are in the freeze for wheezy, so we should have an eye on rules from release-team[1]. So an upload should preferably only fix some of the 'important' marked bugs in BTS or changes which absolutely need to go to wheezy. [1]: http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html > And, anyway, I'm not using smbldap-tools anymore, if anyone on the Cc: list > wants to take over mainteinance, be my guest, please. I'm sorry I'm not using smbldap-tools too, tt only appeared on my 'radar' some time ago to remove the Digest::SHA1 dependency which was one goal of the Debian Perl Group, and now due to the bugreport from Saulo on libconvert-asn1-perl. > BTW, I've already have the latest upstream version packaged, but I didn't > uploaded it because I wanted to see how many debian bugs were closed by it and > didn't had the time to look into it and test (I planned to use a LXC container > with a clean installation of a system with OpenLDAP and SAMBA, but I haven't > been able to work on it in the last weeks). This is great, as more (important) bugs fixed with a new release the better. Again, sorry cannot help here good, but maybe Saulo can provide some feedback? Regards, Salvatore
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
