Hi Michael,

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:33:34AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote:
> This doesn't seem to be the case. It looks like the actual encoding is
> iso8859. Could you please confirm that? I can do the conversion myself,
> but it would be nice to know the actual encoding so we don't get subtle
> problems that I might no be able to see easily (given my lack of
> Spanish).

My fault, please find attached the translation in UTF-8 (compressed to
avoid problems with my mutt configuration).

Regards,
-- 
Fernando C. Estrada

"...Deep Hack Mode--that mysterious and frightening state of
consciousness where Mortal Users fear to tread."
(By Matt Welsh)

Attachment: es.po.gz
Description: Binary data

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to