tag 677113 confirmed tag 677113 pending thanks On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:20:41AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: > Don't you hate it when an update wrecks a package and then just is left > sitting there.
Well, yes, but the NMU help is appreciated and this seems like it's actually a regression in libjpeg's scaling functionality, since it worked fine previously. I will upload a new version of xli which no longer tries to use libjpeg's scaling functionality and will handle zooming JPEGs like any other image type, which I've confirmed fixes this problem. Thanks, Ryan -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
