Hi, On Mon, 02 Jul 2012, Jakub Wilk wrote: > In any case, arguing other this is not a productive use of my time. > dpkg developers: if you are are not interested in the patch I > proposed, please tell me as soon as possible, so that I can close > the bug and work on another (inferior) solution to my problem.
I would like to provide something to help you build a clean solution but I believe that the current patch isn't that thing. That said it's not clear to me what the proper solution would be. It probably involves abstracting the work of dpkg-buildpackage in a dedicated perl module and making it possible to use alternate implementation at the same time. That alternate implementation could reuse the default implementation and call it in a loop. But maybe others have better ideas. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook: → http://debian-handbook.info/get/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
