On tor, 2012-06-28 at 19:02 -0400, Steve Singer wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > On mån, 2012-06-25 at 16:00 -0400, Steve Singer wrote: > > > In terms of Debian releases, stable contains slony built for 8.4, so > > shipping slony for 9.1 that does not work with serializable transactions > > is not a regression (at least with this bug report serving as additional > > documentation). I don't think updating to 2.1 is possible at this > > point. > > I agree this isn't an issue in stable if it has slony for 8.4. Whichever > release gets upgraded to 9.1 (experimental? unstable?) should be bumped to > slony 2.1 around the same time.
No, I meant that stable has slony for 8.4, and testing (the next stable) has slony for 9.1, which means someone upgrading from stable to the next stable won't experience a regression, except that they will need to make sure they use the repeatable read isolation level. Testing is currently frozen, so putting in a new major upstream release is not possible. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
