On 6/26/2012 10:50 AM, Steve Schnepp wrote: > ... Hoping onto the thread. > > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Kenyon Ralph <[email protected]> wrote: > >> CGI graphing was not the default in munin 1.4. So, for most >> installations, munin 2.0 is a significant change in this respect. > > 1.4 defaults to cron. 2.0 is mostly CGI-only. > > I'm working on bringing back cron graphing in 2.0, since several users > reported issues > with CGI setup. Should land on 2.0.2.
I may end up being such a user. The machine on which I run the munin front end is an ancient dual CPU 550MHz Pentium II box. The cron graphing mode worked great. I fear the real time HTML and CGI graphing will be painfully slow, especially if the "intentionally single threaded" comment I read means it will only use one CPU for graph generation. With this machine, obviously, both CPUs need to be in play as often as possible given the low clock. Hopefully I'll get 2.0 running soon and can give feedback. >>>> If this is not a bug, and a bug report isn't the proper place to receive >>>> troubleshooting assistance to get this working, where do you recommend I >>>> go for assistance? > > A bug report is a perfect place to trace down things. So thanks to > have opened it. You're welcome. Sorry that my original report wasn't concise and slowed the process down. I simply didn't know the exact nature/cause at the time, simply that something went horribly wrong in the upgrade. > That said, for proper/fast resolution, see below. > >> Several munin developers and users use munin with lighttpd, so you >> might find help in the #munin channel on oftc.net IRC. > > That's currently your best bet (IRC), as I do also use lighttpd. > Since I'm using a fairly dodgy setup on my dev box and I lack time to > write proper doc, well... If multiple/many munin devs use lighty, then ... need I ask the obvious? >> In the process, with your help, we could improve the documentation >> and packaging of munin and its integration with lighttpd. > > That's also in the process. > > As kenyon suggested, if you even take part of it, many would be more > than glad to spend some time with you debugging. Sure. I' was going to try to revert back to 1.4.6. But I can live without my graph data for a little while if I can help get 2.0 + lighty working better for all users. > Then once the doc is adequate on the matter, packaging integration > will happen quite quickly, for everyone's benefit. > So, sorry for the inconvenience, but a hop on IRC will show you that > we're not in our ivory tower. Just that we are unfortunately quite > busy... What's best time of day for IRC? I'm Central US. I ask as some projects have many participants in far flung time zones. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
