begin quotation from Adam D. Barratt (in <1339930157.7014.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>): > On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 12:14 +0200, Arne Wichmann wrote: > > Just to remember... As far as I can see there are no more rdepends left. > > Are there any more reasons not to remove t1lib? > > How did you determine that? Running "dak rm -Rn t1lib" on ftp-master > says:
It seems I should improve on my tool knowledge. > Checking reverse dependencies... > # Broken Depends: > dvi2ps: dvi2ps [amd64] > evince: libevdocument3-4 > grace: grace > gtkmathview: libgtkmathview-bin > libgtkmathview-dev > libgtkmathview0c2a > lablgtkmathview: liblablgtkmathview-ocaml > vflib3: vflib3 [amd64 armel armhf i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 mips > mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc] > vflib3-bin > vflib3-dev > > # Broken Build-Depends: > claws-mail: libt1-dev > evince: libt1-dev > grace: libt1-dev > gtkmathview: libt1-dev (>= 5.1.1-1.1) > swftools: libt1-dev > vflib3: libt1-dev > > Dependency problem found. So it is time to file bugs to these respective packages, isn't it? cu AW -- [...] If you don't want to be restricted, don't agree to it. If you are coerced, comply as much as you must to protect yourself, just don't support it. Noone can free you but yourself. (crag, on Debian Planet) Arne Wichmann (a...@linux.de)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature