On 2012-06-04 13:17, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > as far as I can see this is rather a consequence of #607638 which hardly > can be closed due to the fact that it is in stable. As far as I can > see the bug is *not* found in Version: 1:3.0-27. > > So what would you actually suggest to close this bug?
Looks like you got it fixed before I could a look at the package :-) Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
