tags 330295 + etch-ignore
thanks
not all files have been relicensed to gpl. MPL is non-free,
nevertheless keep.
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:07:32PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> Is this bug about the fact that the MPL isn't free, or about the fact that
> the copyright file doesn't mention the GPL?
>
> The latter issue isn't RC; all of the information in the copyright file is
> correct TTBOMK, the file just fails to mention that (the majority of) the
> source is also available under a different, more permissive set of rights.
> However, I don't see any reason *not* to fix that bug, either.
>
> The former issue is RC, but I consider the etch-ignore tag appropriate with
> the understanding that upstream is actively working on getting all of the
> code formally relicensed. If this were to change, or if it should become
> clear than some portion of the code will *not* be relicensed, then that is
> an issue that cannot be ignored for etch.
>
- Alexander
p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To: or CC: when
replying to this mail (e.g. /reply-all/).
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack | : :' : The universal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | `. `' Operating System
http://www.asoftsite.org | `- http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
