Michael Tokarev wrote: > Note again that NFSv4 does not work with autofs still -- > namely, its /net map still requires portmapper. And > note - also again - that even without turning on this > "HAVE_NFS" thing, it were working just by a chance.
I'm not disputing that showmount relies on rpc, and hence the /net map as currently implemented requires it. I don't use or enable the /net map, so it doesn't concern me that it wouldn't work with my server configuration. > I'll take another look at what the two options (with > and without "NFS Support") gives. > > But I want to understand: why all this shouting from > you? Regression reports demoted to wishlist severity will not prevent damaged behavior from entering stable where we'll have to cope with it for years. NFSv4 was a big step forward towards removing notoriously insecure daemons from the network, it would be a real shame to see that hard work go to waste becuase of a lousy automount implementation. It's bad enough that v4-only servers still have to run portmap or rpcbind for local upcalls. -- Jamie Heilman http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
