On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 01:31:59PM +0100, Robert Lemmen wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 02:23:06PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> > The removal is coming in 2 weeks or so, so it makes little sense maintaining
> > in the archive more days when it is available from snapshots.debian.org
> > 
> > I am planning a similar blog post to this one:
> > http://ekaia.org/blog/2011/03/21/small-applications-missing-in-kde-4/
> > with Qt3 and i will include mnemosyne. Maybe somebody will feel like
> > doing a qt4 version, it happened with some of the removed kde3 apps!
> 
> understood and agreed, but give me 1 more week. I already have a working
> package [0] ready, and the only thing required now is to conclude the
> discussion with upstream whether I should upload this repository-based
> version or wait for a tarball from them [1].
> 
> is my understanding correct: you would ask for removal from testing, but
> not from sid? so once it does build against testing again it will
> auto-migrate from sid to testing again? in that case just remove away!
> 

Oh, great!
If you have a Qt4 package. Just upload it to the archive ASAP closing
this bug in the changelog. Nothing else to do :)

In the case this Qt4 version didn't exist, we would have asked for
the removal from *unstable* to the ftp-masters and the package would
have been removed from testing automatically a few hours or days
later by scripts.

Ana




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to