Kohda-san,
On Mo, 07 Mai 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Yes you are right. I found a few more packages which
> should be removed.
> ptex-base and jbibtex-base are completely included in
> texlive-lang-cjk so should be removed.
Yes, these are all up to the maintainers.
> I believe that mendexk package should be removed also
> because of texlive-binaries.
Yes.
> And only FYI. it seems pdfjam is also included in
> texlive-extra-utils so I think we can remove it.
Yes. That was done already quite some time ago ...
> I'm now checking new texlive packages upgraded in testing
> and find pTeX related programs work incredibly fine.
Good to hear ... anyway, if there are more suggestions, please
let me know ...
Best wishes
Norbert
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norbert Preining preining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live & Debian Developer
DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The main reception foyer was almost empty but Ford
nevertheless weaved his way through it.
--- Ford making his way out of Milliways whilst under the
--- influence of enough alchol to make a rhino sing.
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
