On 05.05.12 Norbert Preining (prein...@logic.at) wrote: Hi,
> > This is just the sub-bug. The initial problem (tex-common tries to > > remove a file w/o checking if it exists (row 406 in tex-common > > postinst) still exists. > > > I disagree, these are two independent bugs. One about the tex-common > trying ro remove texmf.cnf (which has to be here), and one about > missing ulem, which breaks format building. > Correct. But the submitter was ignorant enough to file only one bug (AFAICT). I'd work on the first issue and silently ignore the second one, I guess the submitter understood that it was his fault. > The one about texmf.cnf .... I don't know, butcan be easy be fixed, > although it is the failure of the sysadmin. > Not sure if it makes sense to investiage why /e/t/texmf.cnf was gone. Maybe just replace "rm /etc/texmf..." by "rm -f /etc/texmf..." and all is fine. Although this may hide a problem caused by another package. H. -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
