severity 666330 serious thanks On 10/04/12 at 22:13 +0200, Pierre Chifflier wrote: > tags 666330 + moreinfo unreproducible > severity 666330 normal > thanks > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:21:15AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Source: suricata > > Version: 1.2.1-1 > > Severity: serious > > Tags: wheezy sid > > User: [email protected] > > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120330 qa-ftbfs qa-ftbfs-buildarch > > Justification: FTBFS on amd64 > > > > Hi, > > > > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > > amd64. > > > > This rebuild was done by building only architecture:any binary packages > > (binary-arch target of debian/rules), and using a recent dpkg that uses the > > build-arch target if available. > > Also, only the Build-Depends were installed, not the Build-Depends-Indep. > > Hi Lucas, > > I tried for some time to reproduce the problem, without success - I may > be missing something here. > apt-get source suricata + apt-get build-dep suricata => works > > The only difference I have in the build-logs is that the dh_install line > does not mention the same directory (you have > debian/tmp/suricata-debian.yaml, while I get ./suricata-debian.yaml). > > Any idea ?
Looking at your debian/rules, I think that the problem is that you create suricata-debian.yaml in the 'build' target, but not in 'build-arch'. Also, your debian/rules look very strange. You probably want to use dh's override targets, not directly override the build/clean targets. (that would be the correct 'dh' way to fix that bug, I think) Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
