My main motivation is that for years uses see "checking" messages at boot.
On a dentist's bill at least "checking" is separate from "treating". So somehow the user should be more informed about what is going on. Else he wonders if all that Windows defragmentation is somehow unnecessary on Linux, and for years his disks have "passed with flying colors"... When if fact the dentist is doing more than just looking. I really have no idea. I just wish =====Checking... done=== messages were more honest. I'm not saying some report should be printed, or each implementation needs to give full disclosure. I just don't like my dentist to say he only "checked" when he in fact plans to "check and maybe alter". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org