On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:07:08PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > mån 2012-03-19 klockan 18:10 +0200 skrev Tzafrir Cohen: > > severity 664611 normal > > retitle -1 asterisk: private copy of libilbc > > thanks > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:09:04PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > > Severity: serious > > > Package: asterisk > > > Version: 1:1.8.10.0~dfsg-1 > > > User: [email protected] > > > Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc > > > > (How do I remove those)? > > > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > This source package contains the following files from the IETF under > > > non-free license terms: > > > > > > asterisk-1.8.10.0/codecs/ilbc/rfc3951.txt > > > > As mentioned elsewhere, it is now free. > > The RFC? I would be very surprised if that were the case. Could you > substantiate this other by "elsewhere"? A patent license is not a > software license.
Right. That specific file looks non-free and should be removed. Pending in the SVN. > > > In fact, Upstream removed it in > > previous versions, and re-acepted it in 1.8.10 due to the proper > > license. > > What license? Looking for it now. I can't find anything more explicit than http://www.webrtc.org/ilbc-freeware . This page states that the code from http://ilbcfreeware.org/ is now under the same license as the code in webrtc.org, that is a 3-clause BSD. The code in codecs/ilbc in asterisk was generally generated using contrib/scripts/get_ilbc_source.sh (though the files LICENSE* and PATENTS are not included in the files generated by that script). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[email protected] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[email protected] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[email protected]/tzafrir -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
