On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 13:07 -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > That's interesting. I was planning to move discover back into /bin, get > rid of "discover-static", and link the /bin version statically. Do you > think /sbin is a better choice for consistency?
It would be a better choice for _consistency_ _if_ the program operates more or less in the same way. Consistency aside, the question of whether the program should go in /sbin or /bin should decided by whether or not non-administrators have any use for the program. If discover is strictly an administrator's utility then it should go in /sbin. If non-administrators could have some use for it then it should go in /bin. Sometimes it's hard to decide; ultimately, though, it doesn't matter that much which one you choose. > (The discover-static mess was largely the result of avoiding curl deps, > which will be gone from discover 2.0.7.) Any idea when 2.0.7 will be out? Will it include the patch that (reportedly) fixes #269372? -- Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
