> -- Original Message --
> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:44:28 +1100
> To: Joel Soete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small)
> Subject: Re: Bug#292927: top doesn't show right info on parisc since 
> 2.6.10-pa7?
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:24:09AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote:
> > I am running a unstable debian on parisc platform with a development
linux
> > kernel 2.6.11-rc2-pa3 :-)
>
> OK so you're running a woody procps over not even an sarge but some
> development kernel. I think that might be called "asking for it"
> considering the last 2.0 procps was written in April 2002.
>
Oops my bad (cut and past and forget to change release :( ) very sorry actual
release used is unstable one:
 # dpkg -l procps
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name                        Version                     Description
+++-===========================-===========================-======================================================================
ii  procps                      3.2.5-1                     /proc file system
utilities
(again appologies)

> > But it doesn't help at all :(
> >
> > What did I missed? Any idea?
> Is it compiling or not?
Obviously but not cahnge in the diplayed values

> I'm trying to understand what is wrong other
> than the top header.
>
Well have no yet enough clue in the way that top collect its info but I noticed
:
on a 2.6.10-pa6:
# cat /proc/stat
cpu  763640 1207382 1497781 223046615 4711665 0 20982
cpu0 763640 1207382 1497781 223046615 4711665 0 20982
[...]

but now with a 2.6.10-pa7:
# cat /proc/stat
cpu  85360 16430 0 0 0 29916369 0 0
cpu0 85360 16430 0 0 0 29916369 0 0
[...]

Does it matter?
If yes it seems to be bug in hppa tree?

> > PS: btw how may I localy change this line
> > "Cpu(s):  1.3% us,  1.3% sy,  0.0% ni, 96.4% id,  1.0% wa,  0.0% hi,
 0.0%
>
> I don't think you can anymore.
>
:-( but ok

Thanks for help,
    Joel



Reply via email to