> -- Original Message -- > Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 15:44:28 +1100 > To: Joel Soete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Craig Small) > Subject: Re: Bug#292927: top doesn't show right info on parisc since > 2.6.10-pa7? > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:24:09AM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > > I am running a unstable debian on parisc platform with a development linux > > kernel 2.6.11-rc2-pa3 :-) > > OK so you're running a woody procps over not even an sarge but some > development kernel. I think that might be called "asking for it" > considering the last 2.0 procps was written in April 2002. > Oops my bad (cut and past and forget to change release :( ) very sorry actual release used is unstable one: # dpkg -l procps Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-===========================-===========================-====================================================================== ii procps 3.2.5-1 /proc file system utilities
(again appologies) > > But it doesn't help at all :( > > > > What did I missed? Any idea? > Is it compiling or not? Obviously but not cahnge in the diplayed values > I'm trying to understand what is wrong other > than the top header. > Well have no yet enough clue in the way that top collect its info but I noticed : on a 2.6.10-pa6: # cat /proc/stat cpu 763640 1207382 1497781 223046615 4711665 0 20982 cpu0 763640 1207382 1497781 223046615 4711665 0 20982 [...] but now with a 2.6.10-pa7: # cat /proc/stat cpu 85360 16430 0 0 0 29916369 0 0 cpu0 85360 16430 0 0 0 29916369 0 0 [...] Does it matter? If yes it seems to be bug in hppa tree? > > PS: btw how may I localy change this line > > "Cpu(s): 1.3% us, 1.3% sy, 0.0% ni, 96.4% id, 1.0% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.0% > > I don't think you can anymore. > :-( but ok Thanks for help, Joel