On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:02:16AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Branden Robinson wrote:
>
> >>From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]:
> >
> > exude
> > v 1: release (a liquid) in drops or small quantities; "exude
> > sweat through the pores" [syn: {exudate}, {transude},
> > {ooze out}, {ooze}]
> > 2: make apparent by one's mood or behaviour; "She exude great
> > confidence"
> >
> >"She exude"???
> >
> >"SHE EXUDE"???
> >
> >I exude.
> >You exude.
> >He exudes.
> >She exudes.
> >It exudes.
> >They exude.
> >We exude.
> >
> >WordNet sucks.
> But this bug report sucks as well. I'm sorry, but I'm no native speaker and
> do not really know how to fix your problem.See above: > >She exudes. > Could you please provide a patch? I have no idea how I can fix your problem [...] Er, well, I would expect the maintainer of a dictionary package to be able to edit entries in it. But I'll see if I can come up with a diff to the source package in the near future. > neither do I know why this bug reports has severity "normal" (instead of > wishlist). It's a dictionary. It shouldn't have incorrect examples of language usage. -- G. Branden Robinson | Organized religion is a sham and a Debian GNU/Linux | crutch for weak-minded people who [EMAIL PROTECTED] | need strength in numbers. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Jesse Ventura
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
