It seems the email address I have for Valek is bouncing -- I've removed
him from the CC.

Ar 23/01/2005 am 19:53, ysgrifennodd Ralph Giles:
> Your summary is more or less accurate. We've never had much success
> coordinating with fillippov. I don't know if it's a language barrier, 
> lack of interest, or what.
> 
> Fontforge is the preferred editing tool for these fonts and the solution 
> is as you suggest. In addition, after the new fontset is written out, 
> the metrics should be checked against the published Adobe sets to make 
> sure they match properly. (And perhaps also checked against previous 
> gs-fonts releases to make sure there are at least no regressions.)

Ok, I'd be happier if I knew of some ways I could perform QA on the
modifications which I make.

How would I go about checking the metrics?

> I think there are also some hinting problems that crept back into one of 
> the releases.

Some suggestions on how I can test for this?

> It's not so much that we're upstream from Valek or vice versa. Better to 
> think of us as two different distributions. He releases more often, and 
> we're more careful with the quality of the distributions we make for use 
> with Ghostscript.

Thanks for clarifying the situation.

I'd be interested to hear about the methods you use to merge work back
and forth. Is it simply a matter of copying and pasting things in
Fontforge, or is there more to it than that? Do you work from .pfb/.afm
files, or Fontforge's .sfd, or some other format?

> Note that we have a resource problem getting all this done, which is the 
> main reason it's years between releases. Help with the above steps and 
> addressing the issues collected at 
> 
>   http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=687297
> 
> Would be much appreciated.

Ok, I'll pass on anything I find out.

-- 
Dafydd


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to