* Bastian Kleineidam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-01-12 02:33]: > On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 11:57:29AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >> I'm not very fit when it comes to python. I've read a bit in that page >> and slightly understood the reasoning. Should the python-metakit package >> be built from a different source package so the transition is easier, or >> doesn't that matter? How is that part usually done? > The source package can be the same. Just changing the binary package > names in debian/control should be sufficient.
I wasn't puzzled by that part. :) I rather want to know if the following is sufficient: Package: python2.3-metakit Provides: python-metakit instead of having _two_ packages, one just empty. But after some more thought I can see the need for the empty additional package, I'll do that magic in my debian/rules soon. Thanks for your patience. So long, Alfie -- 1) the german book <a href="http://www.debiananwenderhandbuch.de/";>Debian 2) the Ferman book <a href="http://www.debiananwenderhandbuch.de/";>Debian 3) the German book <a href="http://www.debiananwenderhandbuch.de/";>Debian -- "in three steps to the right spelling", english/events/2004/0318-cebit.wml
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
