Note: I am not Maintainer of this package. Am 2005-01-14 16:54:08, schrieb Mathieu Roy: > Package: spamassassin > Version: 3.0.2-1 > Severity: normal
> 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: Envoyé directement depuis une adresse IP > dynamique > [151.24.72.136 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] > 1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: Envoyé depuis une adresse IP dynamique > [151.24.72.136 listed in combined.njabl.org] > > > While it was effectively a spam caught, DUL/Dynamic IP scoring (1.7) > is quite problematic. Why ? - Lowering let around 50% of the SPAM in > - The score increase with each DNSbl you use, even if they use the > exact same source Thats right. > - Why the hell freedom to run a server should not be given to someone > behind dynamic IP? Restricting users freedom is a very sensitive issue, > I do not think software shipped by Debian by default should > criminalize dynamic IP users by assuming they are guilty of something. This is a protection for innocent $USER. I do not allow any Messages comeing from DUL. > So, would it be possible to have the DUL test deactivated by default, > or with a score less important (0.1 is fine)? It is good that a piece Do you know, that you can lower the SCORE from ___( '/home/michelle.konzack/.spamassassin/user_prefs' )______________ / | score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0.1 | score RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL 0.1 \______________________________________________________________________ > of software like spamassassin get distributed widely. Spam will be > less and less commercially interesting. But it should not cost end > users freedom to run a server, don't you agree? If spamassassin lower the score, we get two times more SPAM in our boxes as with this high score. I do not like to chnage some 100 Boxes to higher score. 1.7 is right. And, - there are very less $USER, which send messages directly, but millions of SPAMesn SPAMbots and Viruses. > People that run DUL DNSbl warn users about DUL list usage. The problem > here is that someone may filter DUL users without even noticing it, > just like if it were an absolutely reliable anti-spam criterion. I do not like DUL-Sender, because never had someone which had send a Messages directly and I am working since many years with Linux. > Regards, Greetings Michelle -- Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886 50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi 0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature
