Your message dated Sun, 11 Nov 2018 21:09:00 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: initscripts: checkroot.sh calls "reboot -f" instead of
kexec
has caused the Debian Bug report #460085,
regarding initscripts: checkroot.sh calls "reboot -f" instead of kexec
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
460085: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460085
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.86.ds1-38.1
Severity: normal
reboot -f
is called in several places from within checkroot.sh.
But if the user decided to install & use kexec, wouldn't calling
kexec -f
be the better choice?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.23.13 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages initscripts depends on:
ii debianutils 2.28.2 Miscellaneous utilities specific t
ii e2fsprogs 1.40.3-1 ext2 file system utilities and lib
ii libc6 2.7-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii lsb-base 3.1-24 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip
ii mount 2.13-8 Tools for mounting and manipulatin
ii sysvinit-utils 2.86.ds1-38.1 System-V-like utilities
Versions of packages initscripts recommends:
ii psmisc 22.5-1 Utilities that use the proc filesy
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
control: tags -1 wontfix
[2008-01-10 14:34] Ralf Hildebrandt <[email protected]>
> reboot -f
>
> is called in several places from within checkroot.sh.
> But if the user decided to install & use kexec, wouldn't calling
>
> kexec -f
>
> be the better choice?
Definitely not. Binary package, which diverts /sbin/reboot would be much
more intuitive. Closing.
--- End Message ---
