On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:04 PM Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:54 PM Jessica Clarke <jrt...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > On 12 Aug 2020, at 19:51, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > HI Jess, > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:21 PM Jessica Clarke <jrt...@debian.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> On 12 Aug 2020, at 19:15, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukher...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Control: tags 957380 + patch > > >>> Control: tags 957380 + pending > > >>> > > >>> Dear maintainer, > > >>> > > >>> I've prepared an NMU for istgt (versioned as 0.4~20111008-3.1) and > > >>> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I > > >>> should cancel it. > > >> > > >> Thanks, I've been meaning to do this but it's just not a high enough > > >> priority for me. Could you please however use `typedef` instead, as I > > >> believe the intent of the code (based on how these ones are written, > > >> and what's around it) is to have `ISTGT_LU_TASK_TYPE` be the type name, > > >> not `enum ISTGT_LU_TASK_TYPE`? Would you also be willing to file it as > > >> a merge request against https://salsa.debian.org/bsd-team/istgt?
https://salsa.debian.org/bsd-team/istgt has UNRELEASED changes and the version is 0.5~20120901-1 there. But since there is no pristine-tar or upstream branch, I am unable to generate istgt_0.5~20120901.orig.tar.gz to build and test with the proposed patch. -- Regards Sudip
