Hello, Sebastiaan Couwenberg, le jeu. 02 janv. 2020 20:51:43 +0100, a ecrit: > as long as the Architecture field doesn't > support excludes like Build-Depends I'm not willing to apply it.
I agree that the arch list maintenance burden is problematic. Does anybody know if some effort has been started to enable excludes there? > Is there a particular reason you want to build gdal on hppa, hurd & > kfreebsd? Is it blocking any important packages? It is directly blocking various packages (see attached list), and from there, by dependency, 81 packages in total on hurd-i386. > I can't imagine actual users of gdal on those archs, but it may be a > lack of imagination on my part. direct users, possibly not indeed, but indirectly you quickly get packages which can be obstacle to other things, e.g. a positioning package that would happen to be used by widgets of desktop environments. Samuel
"cloudcompare" "epigrass" "fiona" "flightgear" "gdal" "gmt" "grass" "libcitygml" "libgdal-grass" "libopencv-imgcodecs3.2" "libosmium" "liggghts" "mapcache" "ncl" "odin" "openorienteering-mapper" "openscenegraph" "osgearth" "osmcoastline" "otb" "pdal" "pgsql-ogr-fdw" "pktools" "postgis" "pyosmium" "qgis" "qmapshack" "rasterio" "r-cran-rgdal" "r-cran-sf" "saga" "simgear" "sumo"
