Yavor Doganov writes: > В Fri, 12 Jan 2018 11:08:20 +0100, Axel Beckert написа: >> I just read jcristau's mail: I don't see the difference between running >> buildds for jessie-kfreebsd and sid. Why can the one continue while the >> other can't/ > > I don't understand either. I guess DSA are upgrading the last hosts > to stretch as jessie is nearing to EOL. Or they need the machines for > some other services.
There are no buildds for jessie-kfreebsd either (so no security updates either). Hardware resources shouldn't be a problem: I'm fairly sure the buildds were VMs anyway. >>> As kfreebsd-* are probably never going to to be release architectures >>> due to systemd, maybe it is better to move the port to debian-ports. >> >> Wait! Debian runs fine without systemd. sysvinit has recently been >> revived upstream and there's OpenRC which is doing fine on my boxes. > > My impression was that the release team would not bless an > architecture if it doesn't use the default init system. Also, certain > sets of packages will not work properly without systemd. kFreeBSD could have chosen to use another default init system. I don't think there is any requirement for this to be the same everywhere. The main problem was that there wasn't anyone willing / having time to commit to kFreeBSD as far as I remember; not much will happen if that is the case. (Hurd was never a release architecture either, though I wouldn't be surprised if someone was trying to blame systemd for that too ;-) ) Ansgar
