Samuel Thibault, on Thu 03 Nov 2016 23:35:53 +0100, wrote: > Josh Triplett, on Thu 03 Nov 2016 15:13:49 -0600, wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:24:55PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: > > > 1) make pthread-stubs "meta package" who's Cflags/Libs expand to the > > > platform > > > specific PTHREAD_{CFLAGS,LIBS} if the runtime does not provide lightweight > > > pthread symbols, or > > I don't have any fundamental objections here, but Linux isn't the > > platform that really needs pthread-stubs in the first place. Could you > > please seek out some feedback from people working on platforms that need > > pthread-stubs for the core stubs, to find out how this might impact > > them? I've CCed a couple of lists of potentially interested folks. > > Concerning GNU/Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD, we simply use glibc's forwarding > mechanism, so pthread-stubs is empty there, and thus 1) is fine there.
Note: I'm only talking about GNU/kFreeBSD here, not FreeBSD which has its own libc which I don't know the status of concerning pthread stubs. Samuel