Dear Glibc Maintainers, Please try to upload the http://bugs.debian.org/785796 bugfix to sid as soon as possible, and it would really help us out. Thanks.
Christoph Egger wrote: > I understand the thing below is the intended fix for util-linux? Is > there some planned timeline to get it into unstable? We're not building > anything currently for as long as util-linux isn't updated so one might > want to push a little Yes, this is intended to fix the current util-linux FTBFS. Something crazy is going on with that, but adding this patch to glibc would be a way to resolve the current issue on kfreebsd. I think util-linux might still need binNMUs by a porter to get our buildds working again. (So in theory one could apply this glibc patch locally, to binNMU util-linux, but I think that'd be against the rules if the change isn't in sid). > stevenc-gu...@alioth.debian.org writes: > > Author: stevenc-guest > > Date: 2015-05-24 14:00:19 +0000 (Sun, 24 May 2015) > > New Revision: 5714 > > > > Modified: > > trunk/glibc-ports/kfreebsd/bits/fcntl.h > > Log: > > provide F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC of POSIX.1-2008, implemented in kfreebsd-10 Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
