On 02/03/14 12:19, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > Might I suggest that the reason is that these is _completely_ different > implementation, with > absolutly no common code?
Right, so conversely, zfs-linux shares a lot of code already with zfsutils and it makes no sense for them to be packaged separately or compete over namespace? > if the FTP maintainers [...] say that this is not acceptable, > then we'll rename it, without any bitching or > whining or expressing opinions that we can't backup with facts. > Basically, their ruling is law. Your opinion is just that - your opinion and > bear no weight at this > moment. It actually seemed to be an offer for collaboration with you, but I don't see that working so well now. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/531356ba.5090...@pyro.eu.org
