On 31/01/2014 22:44, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> 1. Some application-level software is growing hard dependencies on SystemD >> or other Linux-specific components (e.g. X->udev, gdm3->systemd). > > X->udev is utterly wrong.
Ehm, sorry. Bad choice of words. What I meant to say is that X moved from HAL to udev on Linux, leaving other ports stuck with an abandoned codebase (HAL). > HAL isn't maintained, true. But I proposed a > plan to migrate away from HAL to another system allowing for hotplug[1], > and nobody picked it up. That doesn't mean that X is moving to udev-only. > > 1. https://lists.debian.org/20110213124019.gh7...@debian.org > https://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2011/02/msg00173.html > [ Yes, that was 3 (three) years ago. ] See the mail I just sent (X with devd backend). -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52ec449b.9050...@debian.org
