On 20/10/13 23:29, Robert Millan wrote: > Well I think it doesn't hurt to let systemtap-sdt-dev provide sys/sdt.h > at least for the time being. If later on (i.e. when we actually have > DTrace) we find out that there are significant shortcomings, we can > always revert that decision. In the meantime this will allow us to > verify that the magic in GDB also works on GNU/kFreeBSD.
Absolutely agree, since nobody had time to get DTrace working yet, but trying this in the meantime could potentially give us some new functionality. Someone might find a way to adapt DTrace to be able to use this, or (probably after jessie release) adapt systemtap-sdt-dev to give something that is compatible with it. > My suggestion, assuming everyone is okay with it, would be that you make > this package arch-all and add a: > > Replaces: kfreebsd-kernel-headers [kfreebsd-any] systemtap-sdt-dev doesn't replace *all* of kfreebsd-kernel-headers though? If systemtap-sdt-dev is intended to become Build-Essential it mustn't conflict with k-k-h! I assumed k-k-h must stop providing this file, and then systemtap-sdt-dev define a Breaks: on older versions of k-k-h. After that they can be installed together. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5265136f.20...@pyro.eu.org
