On 23/08/2013 14:16, Robert Millan wrote: > On 23/08/2013 11:13, Petr Salinger wrote: >>> Is there any point in keeping kfreebsd-8 in sid? >>> Just wondering if it's worth the extra work. >> >> I am in favour of removal from sid. > > Me too. What do you think about the "dual kernel" magic in D-I? I'm > thinking that perhaps, rather than removing it, we could use it for > kfreebsd-10. There's a chance kfreebsd-10 can be useful in some > situations due to hardware support etc. > > In any case, let's wait a few days first... I'd like to see what Steven > and Christoph think about removal.
Given that there was no objection, I'd like to request removal, but first I need to know what to do about D-I. If we proceed with my proposal, I'd upload kfreebsd-10 to sid before anything else. Again, if I don't hear anyone against this, I'll go ahead and: - Upload kfreebsd-10 (with abiname=0) to sid. - Make D-I a kfreebsd-9 / kfreebsd-10 dual boot. - Request removal of kfreebsd-8. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/521f458d.2020...@debian.org
