2013/7/20 Petr Salinger <petr.salin...@seznam.cz>: >> 111_ldd_load_address.diff changes kernel-user ABI. How mergeable is this? > > It is not ABI chabge, it is only a change of > implementation defined behaviour.
Seems like a moot point. The whole ABI is implementation-defined ;-) > I do not know details of upstream toolchain. > Does it support running binaries via dynamic linker, like > > /lib/ld-kfreebsd-x86-64.so.1 ./a.out No. Their ldd just parses the ELF metadata. The dynamic linker (/libexec/ld-elf.so.1) is not executable by itself. > Compared to http://bugs.debian.org//cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=696556#15 > the final 111_ldd_load_address.diff only changes load address for DSO > without program interpretter, i.e. mostly program interpretter (dynamic > linker) itself. So this change doesn't affect them? Then it shouldn't be hard to persuade them to include it. Otherwise we still have breakage for people running Debian as a chroot under FreeBSD (or people using kfreebsd-downloader). Will you send this patch to freebsd-arch? If not, I will do it. But it is hard for me to defend a patch I don't fully understand. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXM+To=mrnyl+fbe0sqwfedv9w-df1k+9+35r_2bgzx...@mail.gmail.com
