Hi Christoph, On 30 December 2012 at 17:31, Christoph Egger wrote: | Hi! | | Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> writes: | > On 30 December 2012 at 16:15, Christoph Egger wrote: | > | Package: src:rcpp | > | Version: 0.10.2-1 | > | Severity: serious | > | User: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org | > | Usertags: kfreebsd | > | X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org | > | Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) | > | | > | Hi! | > | | > | Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* buildds: | > | > Yup. Rainer Hurling, an active R user on *BSD, already told me about it and | > provided a patch for FreeBSD (as I happen to be upstream and Debian maintainer). | > | > How do I best get "all BSDs" at once? Currently we do | > | > #elif defined(linux) || defined(__linux) || defined(__FreeBSD__) | > | > in two place. If memory serves, there were a) similar handles for NetBSD and | > OpenBSD I should add. And which one do you guys need for the BSD kernel on | > Debian? | | Jep I'm seeing __NetBSD__ and __OpenBSD__ in lots of source. kFreeBSD
Ok, will add these two but ... | uses __FreeBSD_kernel__ which -- if memory serves me correctly -- be | also defined in newer FreeBSDs. ... you are telling me I also need this? Can't you guys just settle for __WhateverBSD__ and leave the rest of us alone? ;-) Cheers, Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20704.62255.105601.290...@max.nulle.part
