On 20/06/12 15:59, Nicholas Bamber wrote: > Based upon the feedback I have received (including #debian-hurd) I am > attaching a new debdiff.
This debdiff doesn't address the main point of my original mail: sockaddr_dl and net/if_dl.h are not (k)FreeBSD-specific, so a test for FreeBSD || FreeBSD_kernel would not be appropriate. It might "work" but would only replace one portability issue with another. The new test for AF_LINK && !GNU looks even worse to me. Does GNU/Hurd _really_ define AF_LINK and yet not provide a net/if_dl.h with a definition for sockaddr_dl? Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fe23ac7.6020...@pyro.eu.org
