Hi Paolo, El 24 de març de 2012 23:02, Paolo Delbene <id3r...@gmail.com> ha escrit: > 23 march 2012 10:16 p.m., Richard Matthew Stallman <rms@> wrote: >> My impression was that there was a specific effort to implement a set of >> headers and in-kernel hooks as original work under the BSDL, that would be >> sufficient to allow a CDDL-licensed module to be loaded at runtime and >> still supply ZFS functionality. > >> It would violate the GPL to load that CDDL-licensed module dynamically >> into a GPL-covered kernel.
Thanks for bringing this up. Note that we don't provide a GPL-covered kernel. We do, however, provide a few kernel modules under GPLv2. The question here is whether we can provide a kernel alongside some CDDL modules and some GPLv2 modules. I'm afraid I can't answer this question. If you want to pursue this, note that this is a technical-oriented list. I recommend you bring it up on debian-legal instead. If it turns out that we can't distribute this, there are ways in which this could be resolved (upstream 10-CURRENT branch includes BSDL replacements for the remaining GPLv2 bits). -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOfDtXMr2osN3_osACzRHV+JAM9i8SuXF6Z=zn6k8cl1vqa...@mail.gmail.com
