Am 25.02.2012 11:46 schrieb Robert Millan: > El 25 de febrer de 2012 0:49, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger >> El 24 de > febrer de 2012 0:55, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger >>> <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2...@gmx.net> ha escrit: >>>> #include <machine/cpufunc.h> >>>> #define off64_t off_t >>>> #define lseek64 lseek >>> Actually, we have machine/cpufunc.h (we have everything in machine/* >>> actually). The off_t / lseek defines after this look dangerous though >>> (they collide with glibc definitions). >> Comment has been replaced with >> /* Note that FreeBSD kernel with glibc has conflicting out[bwl] definitions >> * in machine/cpufunc.h and sys/io.h. Use cpufunc.h only for plain FreeBSD. >> */ > Uhm no, we removed the conflicts. We need to allow programs to > include both headers painlessly. Again, just pick the one you prefer. > cpufunc.h is supposed to work, and if it doesn't it's a bug.
Thanks for the info, I have adjusted the comment: /* Note that Debian/kFreeBSD (FreeBSD with glibc) machine/cpufunc.h contains out[bwl] definitions which are incompatible with FreeBSD machine/cpufunc.h. Use machine/cpufunc.h only for plain FreeBSD. */ Background: FreeBSD machine/cpufunc.h has outb(port,data). Linux/glibc sys/io.h has outb(data,port). Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f49064e.9070...@gmx.net
