On 23. Dec 2011, at 04:19 , Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, peter green wrote:
>
>> While looking at why stud FTBFS on all architectures except i386 and amd64
>> (as part of looking at armhf build failures to try to increase armhf's build
>> percentage) I decided to take a look at why it wasn't building on kfreebsd.
>> I discovered that it was trying to use the socket option TCP_KEEPIDLE.
>>
>> Does freebsd/kfreebsd have an equivilent to this socket option?
>
> Judging from http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/netinet/tcp_timer.c it's just
> SO_KEEPALIVE. Note that the always_keepalive sysctl defaults to on, so
> people should be getting keepalives most of the time unless they do something
> special.
We had two independent patches (also trying to get NetBSD, Darwin and Linux
compat) and enhancement, which are currently under review. FreeBSD 9 has
spares for this so it can be merged to stable/9 easily. The change will add
KEEPINTVL, KEEPCNT, KEEPINIT and KEEPIDLE (badly named but already pseudo
industry standard).
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1f0e7a42-527e-45cb-9fa7-85373c29f...@lists.zabbadoz.net
