[tl,dr; these changes broke d-i in stable] On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 00:25 +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > 2011/9/27 Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>: > >> > - Does this affect which modules end up in the udebs? > > > > It looks like this was missed in the original follow-up. As a related > > query, has a test build of kfreebsd-kernel-di-* been performed in order > > to find out whether any additional modules get pulled in to the > > packages? > > I just tried. The resulting file lists are identical.
debian-installer was binNMUed earlier today in preparation for the point release, and FTBFS on kfreebsd-i386. The log finishes with: # Move the kernel image out of the way. mv -f ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/kfreebsd.gz ./tmp/cdrom/kfreebsd.gz; test -e ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/zfs || rmdir ./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/ rmdir: failed to remove `./tmp/cdrom/tree/boot/': Directory not empty make[7]: *** [stamps/tree-unpack-cdrom-stamp] Error 1 The problem appears to be that the contents of the kernel udeb have changed: $ debdiff kernel-image-8.1-1-486-di_0.6_kfreebsd-i386.udeb kernel-image-8.1-1-486-di_0.6+b1_kfreebsd-i386.udeb [...] Files in second .deb but not in first ------------------------------------- -rw-r--r-- root/root /boot/acpi.ko This appears to be due to the fact that the new kfreebsd-8 +squeeze1 kernel on -i386 builds acpi.ko as a module, which is then picked up by existing "install this module if it exists" rules in kernel-wedge. A quick fix would be appreciated, whether from the kfreebsd or d-i side, given the increasingly short period of time we have remaining until the point release is scheduled. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1317853200.4522.22.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
