Dear Robert and all fellows, torsdag den 21 juli 2011 klockan 10:52 skrev Robert Millan detta: > 2011/7/21 Mats Erik Andersson <mats.anders...@gisladisker.se>: > > Do feel invited to take part in deciding whether > > the license names > > > > 4-clause BSD, 3-clause BSD, FreeBSD, and ISC > > In case this serves, I used "X-clause BSD" in fuse4bsd, for the > 2-clause license too. I think calling it 2-clause is much less > confusing than "FreeBSD license".
Based on this I made a quick change leading to 4-clase BSD, 3-clause BSD, 2-clause BSD, and FreeBSD being the only stated licenses. (I misremembered to content of ISC!) I have mentioned "2-clause BSD" and "FreeBSD" as synonyms, and I have left the license name "FreeBSD" as applying to the make files which clearly are originating from the FreeBSD project, as well as for our own packaging directory "debian/". This latter assignation is for Petr Salinger, Guillem Jover, and myself, so at least we must agree before officially packaging the ported software! It is just a personal guess to make the origin, within glibc-bsd/kFreeBSD, clearer. Best regards, Mats E A -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110721113223.ga6...@mea.homelinux.org
