This was very helpful, so now is the time for two strategic questions.
1. I suggest to let "src:freebsd-utils" build a new binary
package "freebsd-quota". Would this naming be acceptable?
In fact, we already have also source package zfsutils (and ufsutils) [1].
The whole new source package might be reasonable for freebsd-quota.
2. Since I need to mend seven of these (only `quotaon' is flawless),
is there some subdivision of patches according to directories that
best fits the customs of this group of developers? I prefer to get
to know such practice already now in order to lessen your later
peer review labour.
See debian/patches in freebsd-utils.
Cheers
Petr
[1] svn co svn://svn.debian.org/glibc-bsd/trunk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/pine.lnx.4.62.1101201316300.3...@sci.felk.cvut.cz
