I guess this would require a separate branch for freebsd-libs changes that can't make it to squeeze.
How is branching going to be handled? Is my proposed approach [1][2] acceptable? Does anyone mind if I make copies of freebsd-utils and kfreebsd-8 accordingly? [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2010/12/msg00071.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2010/12/msg00079.html 2010/12/18 Laurent Fousse <lfou...@debian.org>: > Hello, > > I'm sending the following patch for comments and possibly inclusion. > It introduces the libmd{0,-dev} binary packages in the freebsd-libs > source package. libmd is a message digest library (it includes digest > algorithms from the MD{4,5} and SHA{1,2} family). > > My ultimate goal here is to have support for encrypted disk devices > (the "eli" class in geom), and libmd is a dependancy of the userland > geli(8) utility. > > Laurent. > -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin4u38ast0k1rehfhb2zk=1wiz-tisfqq0uj...@mail.gmail.com