I guess this would require a separate branch for
freebsd-libs changes that can't make it to squeeze.

How is branching going to be handled?  Is my proposed
approach [1][2] acceptable?

Does anyone mind if I make copies of freebsd-utils
and kfreebsd-8 accordingly?

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2010/12/msg00071.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-bsd/2010/12/msg00079.html

2010/12/18 Laurent Fousse <lfou...@debian.org>:
> Hello,
>
> I'm sending the following patch for comments and possibly inclusion.
> It introduces the libmd{0,-dev} binary packages in the freebsd-libs
> source package. libmd is a message digest library (it includes digest
> algorithms from the MD{4,5} and SHA{1,2} family).
>
> My ultimate goal here is to have support for encrypted disk devices
> (the "eli" class in geom), and libmd is a dependancy of the userland
> geli(8) utility.
>
> Laurent.
>



-- 
Robert Millan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktin4u38ast0k1rehfhb2zk=1wiz-tisfqq0uj...@mail.gmail.com

Reply via email to