Hi,

2009/10/7 Robert Millan <r...@aybabtu.com>

>
> I tested the daily build today, but instead of installing unstable, I told
> it to install from testing/squeeze.
>
> Seems to be working fine.  The only caveat is that D-I is unable to setup
> the security URIs because http://security.debian.org/ doesn't generate
> kfreebsd-i386 indices yet.
>

That's important, but we have forgotten kfreebsd-amd64.
searc<http://translate.google.com.co/translate_s?hl=en&sl=en&tl=es&q=them&source=translation_link>kfreebsd-amd64.

>
> Even if security support is not available, I think it'd be a good idea to
> have those generated.  CCing debian-security (I think it's the appropiate
> list for this request).
>
> --
> Robert Millan
>
>  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
>  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
>  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-requ...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
>
Cheers,

-- 
Julián Moreno Patiño
Registered GNU Linux User ID 488513
PGP KEY ID B280E07B

Reply via email to