Am Freitag, den 29.02.2008, 09:48 +0100 schrieb Petr Salinger: > > Could you (or someone else) try building glib2.0, libsoup2.4 and gvfs > > from experimental on GNU/kFreeBSD, in that order? I'd like to know if > > there's something to fix before these can go to unstable :) > > glib2.0 (2.15.6-1) builds fine for me. Compared to failed experimental buildd > log, > I used newer glibc and it have been built under kernel based on FreeBSD 7.0, > not 6.x one. > The threadpool-test still FAILS.
That one fails for linux/i386 too, still no idea why :) > libsoup2.4 (2.3.4-1) builds fine for me. That's good news :) > gvfs (0.1.8-1) does not build. > libfuse-dev is linux specific package, gvfs should not build-depend on it on > non-linux platform. > I would guess gvfs-fuse binary package should be also linux specific. > Unfortunately, we do not have "libhal-dev (>= 0.5.10)", our 0.5.9-2+kbsd is > not sufficient. > The patch http://glibc-bsd.alioth.debian.org/patches/hal.diff does not > provide working hald, > so it have not yet been submitted in any BTS. > We have to update our libvolume-id and hal before gvfs can be built. Ok, I'll change the fuse stuff for the next upload already so things probably work magically once libvolume-id and hal are updated :) Thanks for testing these things for me :) PS: does the gdbe stuff work on GNU/kFreeBSD too? I currently have a plain FreeBSD machine here, if gdbe works fine with GNU/kFreeBSD that might be a reason to switch :)
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
