On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 07:15:19PM +0100, Arnout Engelen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 06:56:23PM +0100, Wessel Dankers wrote: > > On 2002-01-17 09:13:07-0800, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > > > My vote is for "Debian NetBSD". > > > > The project itself is called "Debian". It has its own standards regarding > > software freedom: the DFSG. The only reason things like "GNU", "Linux" and > > "HURD" are mentioned at all is because they are considered major components, > > I look at it this way: it makes sense to call the project at least > 'Debian NetBSD' for obvious reasons. The discussion is about wether or not > we want to add a 'GNU/'. Adding this would state that it's a major component. > However, /not/ adding it would not neccesarily mean that we don't think it's > a major component. Removing the 'GNU/' apparantly makes a lot of people here > feel better, and I don't see why it would be a problem.
I have problems with not giving credits to GNU. The GNU project certainly deserves being named. > Arnout Engelen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Gelezen in de Debian Packaging Manual: Maybe you should change this to "Read in the Debian Packaging manual" for all people who don't speak Dutch. :) Jeroen Dekkers -- Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpFSgGXXMHtE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
