Color me an ignorant NetBSD hacker -- what is FHS? Perry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Yes, I can see that. There are things that I myself don't like about > > Debian policy... such as FHS. I know that some pretty good BSD folks > > have some pretty good reasons to dislike FHS. OTOH, there are some > > advantages to the consistency given by the Debian system... there's > > lots of hypocritical Linux distributions out there who claim to be FHS > > compliant but aren't really. The question will be, does the Debian > > project (as a whole) care more about having a great, universal OS, or > > does it care more about being compatible with a bunch of 2nd-rate Linux > > distros? You'll notice that there's talk of not going along with LSB > > because they want us to accept inferior RPM packages... :-) > > I don't see why, debian has accepted RPM packages for years. Alien > + RPM is all that is required for LSB compat. -- Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- NetBSD Development, Support & CDs. http://www.wasabisystems.com/
